Supreme Court and NYU

      • An open letter by former government officials, including Republicans opposing retaliatory government investigations.

      • the Supreme court order issued at about 1:00 AM today forbidding the Trump administration from removing a group of Venezuelan immigrants from the United States without due process. It is quite significant that the order was issued so early in morning and that seven of the nine justices signed on to the order.

      • The excellent analysis of the significance of the order by Prof. Steven Vladek. The order may suggest that the Supreme Court has given up the traditional presumption of regularity of the DOJ filings and assertions, which may make the court less susceptible to the DOJ substantive arguments.  

       The April 18, 2025 DC Circuit stay of Judge Boasberg’s contempt-related order is not of great concern because the briefing schedule is sufficiently brief that the matter of the Judge’s authority will be quickly resolved.,

      • April 17, 2025
         
        TO: The New York University School of Law Community
         
        We are faculty members at New York University School of Law, writing in our
        individual capacities, to affirm our support for the independence of academic
        institutions, lawyers, and judges, and to oppose the federal government’s attacks on
        those valuesattacks that threaten to undermine democracy, the rule of law, and long
        valued constitutional rights, among them freedom of expression and basic due process.
        Each of us brings different, sometimes irreconcilable, perspectives to what the law
        is and should be. The expression of diverse viewpoints is vital to our roles as legal
        educators and scholars.
         
        Even as our perspectives differ on many issues, we share a commitment to the
        lawful expression of ideas, including ones with which we disagree. Those expressions
        are protected by the Constitution, are critical to academic pursuit and the freedom of
        lawyers to represent clients and causes, and are now under threat.
         
        The Administration has pursued executive actions targeting universities, their
        faculties, and their students in ways that undermine academic independence and the free
        exchange of ideas. If such actions continue, the damage to our intellectual communities,
        which depend on the lawful freedom of expression and open exchange of ideas, could
        be immense. So too would be the danger to basic due process values that protect each
        and every one of us. In saying this, we in no way discount the gravity of concerns about
        antisemitism and other forms of bias, which must be taken seriously.
         
        We further share a commitment to the rule of law and to the role of lawyers and
        judges in preserving that rule of law. As the American Bar Association states in the
        preamble to its Model Rules of Professional Conduct, “[a]n independent legal profession
        is an important force in preserving government under law, for abuse of legal authority
        is more readily challenged by a profession whose members are not dependent on
        government for the right to practice.” The Administration’s executive orders targeting
        individual lawyers and law firms have no basis in law and are contrary to the protections
        of our Constitution. Requiring lawyers to acquiesce to improper demands or face such
        punishment places them in a position inconsistent with the essential role of lawyers as
        independent advocates for their clients. Similarly, government threats to impeach judges
        based on disagreements with their judicial decisions are inconsistent with the
        fundamental principles underlying judicial independence, principles that have been
        respected by political actors of all stripes for over 200 years. An independent judiciary is
        essential to the preservation of the rule of law and our most basic constitutional rights.
         
        As legal scholars, we stand together in support of both the academic communities
        and the law firms that have been targeted by unlawful executive actions, and we stand
        together in support of the foundational principles of academic freedom and the rule of
        law.
         
        Sincerely [alphabetically],
         
        Amy Adler
        Barry E. Adler
        Philip G. Alston
        José Enrique Alvarez
        Safaa Aly
        Anthony Amsterdam
        Claudia Angelos
        Deborah N. Archer
        Rachel E. Barkow
        Lily Batchelder
        Bob Bauer
        Barton Beebe
        Vicki L. Been
        Maggie Blackhawk
        Richard R.W. Brooks
        Deborah Kay Burand
        Sarah E. Burns
        Devon Carbado
        Emiliano M. Catan
        Stephen Choi
        Jerome Cohen
        Adam B. Cox
        Noel Cunningham
        Harvey P. Dale
        Alina Das
        Kevin E. Davis
        Peggy Cooper Davis
        Gráinne de Búrca
        Richard A. Epstein
        Cynthia Estlund
        Samuel Estreicher
        John Ferejohn
        Alex Ferrera
        Harry First
        Eleanor Fox
        Daniel Francis
        Barry Friedman
        Jeanne C. Fromer
        Paula Galowitz
        David W. Garland
        Mark A. Geistfeld
        Barbara S. Gillers
        Stephen Gillers
        Clayton P. Gillette
        David Golove
        Ryan Goodman
        Christine Gottlieb
        Molly Griffard
        Martin Guggenheim
        Daniel Harawa
        Brant J. Hellwig
        Daniel Hemel
        Helen Hershkoff
        Randy A. Hertz
        Roderick M. Hills Jr.
        Stephen Holmes
        Daniel Hulsebosch
        Samuel Issacharoff
        Marcel Kahan
        David Kamin
        Mitchell Kane
        Alexis Karteron
        Sally Katzen
        Emma Kaufman
        Charles Knapp
        Lewis Kornhauser
        Sylvia A. Law
        Daryl Levinson
        Deborah Malamud
        Jill Mann
        Florencia MarottaWurgler
        Natalie McCauley
        Theodor Meron
        Arthur R. Miller
        Geoffrey Miller
        Nancy Morawetz
        Trevor W. Morrison
        Erin E. Murphy
        Liam B. Murphy
        Melissa Murray
        Thomas Nagel
        William Nelson
        Burt Neuborne
        Michael Ohlrogge
        Richard H. Pildes
        Richard L. Revesz
        David A.J. Richards
        Edward Rock
        Gerald Rosenfeld
        Nathan Ellis Rouse
        Daniel Rubenfeld
        Laura Sager
        Adam M. Samaha
        Margaret L. Satterthwaite
        Deborah Schenk
        Stephen Schulhofer
        Jason M. Schultz
        Helen S. Scott
        John Sexton
        Catherine M. Sharkey
        Daniel N. Shaviro
        Stanley Siegel
        Katharine Skolnik
        Vincent M. Southerland
        Christopher Jon Sprigman
        John Steines
        Katherine J. Strandburg
        Kim TaylorThompson
        Anthony C. Thompson
        Frank K. Upham
        Jeremy Waldron
        Andrew W. Williams
        Katherine Wood
        Patrice Wylly
        Katrina M. Wyman
        Kenji Yoshino